In reply to:
The statement is a reply to a tweet by a public figure, Senator Hawley, who is raising concerns about government transparency and accountability regarding drone activity. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to government actions and transparency.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the use of emojis could be seen as trivializing a serious issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks substantive content. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely uses emojis without contributing to the discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it lacks meaningful content. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to contribute to the dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.