Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -40
12/18/2024, 4:04:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
Thank you for your leadership, Chairwoman @NancyMace . The American people are grateful for your bipartisan efforts to demand the @DeptofDefense tell the truth about unidentified drones and other anomalous phenomena
Nancy Mace
@NancyMace
·
279d
The American government playing two truths and a lie.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
Fascinating insights
https://irp.fas.org/eprint/gough…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
psyop's going great
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense Neither Congress nor the media nor the public are buying it. The only people selling it are tools. Thank you @mtgreenee
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
·
278d
The American people are greatly concerned about the unidentified drones flying over the Northeast.

We’ve asked everyone for a classified briefing, and members of Congress are still in the dark.

But my understanding is that the Biden administration would just tell us the same…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense As Thomas Jefferson famously said, “Trust the government and the experts, they know best. The people are hysterical and stupid and can’t be trusted to know what’s really going on.”
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense everything’s fine trust the intelligence community when has it ever lied

The statement critiques the Air Force's handling of unidentified drones, comparing it to historical events where threats were underestimated. The tone is critical and skeptical, aiming to highlight perceived inadequacies in government transparency and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('idiotic') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the Air Force's response, suggesting a lack of respect for their communication strategy. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as dismissive rather than constructive, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]