Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -40
12/18/2024, 4:52:16 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
The Air Force admits some of the drones are unidentified & could be malign but we shouldn't worry because "the vast majority" are not malign. That's idiotic. It's like saying "the vast majority of air traffic" on September 11, 2001 and December 7, 1941 was not malign.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
Thank you for your leadership, Chairwoman @NancyMace . The American people are grateful for your bipartisan efforts to demand the @DeptofDefense tell the truth about unidentified drones and other anomalous phenomena
Nancy Mace
@NancyMace
·
279d
The American government playing two truths and a lie.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
Fascinating insights
https://irp.fas.org/eprint/gough…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
psyop's going great
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense Neither Congress nor the media nor the public are buying it. The only people selling it are tools. Thank you @mtgreenee
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
·
278d
The American people are greatly concerned about the unidentified drones flying over the Northeast.

We’ve asked everyone for a classified briefing, and members of Congress are still in the dark.

But my understanding is that the Biden administration would just tell us the same…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
277d
@DeptofDefense As Thomas Jefferson famously said, “Trust the government and the experts, they know best. The people are hysterical and stupid and can’t be trusted to know what’s really going on.”

The statement and its context engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about national security and government transparency regarding unidentified drones. The tone is critical and skeptical of the Department of Defense's handling of the situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential security threats, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for vigilance. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the DOD by implying incompetence or deceit, which could be seen as a violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting potential security issues, but the tone is accusatory rather than empathetic.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism but includes personal attacks, reducing its adherence to this principle. [-1]