Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -40

The statement critiques the Biden administration's handling of drone incursions, suggesting a lack of transparency and control over airspace. It uses strong language, such as 'gas-lighting,' to imply intentional deception by the government.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause public concern or fear, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It accuses the government of deception, which could be seen as disrespectful and lacking in constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and uses charged language, which may hinder productive dialogue. [-1]