Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 81

The statement engages in a critical discussion about the validity of AI model results, specifically questioning the inclusion of training set cases in the evaluation. The tone is confrontational, potentially undermining constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's confrontational tone may cause harm by undermining respectful discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the person it addresses, as it includes a personal attack. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for a personal attack instead. [-2]