Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 81
12/19/2024, 2:14:51 PM
X
In reply to:
MindMirror
@TheMysteryDrop
·
277d
@GaryMarcus Your argument is that without innovations in the underlying architecture (e.g. neurosymbolic) there are hard constraints on the ceiling of how useful AI can be… is that a steelman of your view?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
277d
Total strawman.

I never said “AI is useless” (e.g., I love web search, GPS route planning, web search, recommendation engines and computational photography — and use all of those daily.)

I never even said LLMs are useless; I often say they are useful for brainstorming and…
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
277d
ChatGPT releasing Task today is my bet — this is the true beginning of ending Gary Marcus take that AI is useless. 🔥

The conversation involves a discussion about AI's capabilities and limitations, specifically addressing misconceptions about Gary Marcus's views on AI. The dialogue touches on the importance of innovation in AI architecture and the practical uses of AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation does not cause harm and clarifies misconceptions, promoting a more accurate understanding of the speaker's views. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The dialogue encourages understanding by addressing and correcting a misrepresentation of an opinion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The exchange is constructive, focusing on clarifying a misunderstanding rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]