Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 81
12/19/2024, 2:15:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Jordan Talks Everyday AI
@EverydayAI_
·
277d
Oh, so the human doctors would in theory know, too?

Got it.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
277d
You have to read very far into the replies in thread to discover that the cases may be in the training set.

Caveat emptor.

The statement engages in a discussion about the reliability of AI models versus human doctors in medical diagnosis, referencing a study on AI performance. It questions the comprehensiveness of AI training data, implying skepticism about AI's superiority in medical reasoning.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about over-reliance on AI without full understanding of its limitations.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the capabilities of AI rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the assumptions about AI's capabilities, encouraging a more nuanced understanding. [+1]