Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 68
12/19/2024, 3:06:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Kyle Shannon 🍓
@kyleshannon
·
276d
@BishopBlougram @ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus If AI development stopped TODAY and we could only use what was launched in the past two years, I could easily spend the next 5 years understanding what is now possible.

To think that an AI Winter is a permanent state is equally unrealistic.

I suppose hyperbole is addictive?
Jonas Persson
@BishopBlougram
·
276d
@kyleshannon @ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus Or realism. The idea that, for the first time, progress will continue inimpeded with no AI winter ahead is, shall we say, less than realistic.
Kyle Shannon 🍓
@kyleshannon
·
276d
@ChrisUniverseB Fingers crossed Tasks are next.

Low confidence @GaryMarcus will ever find a soft spot for optimism about OpenAI. His brand is darkness.🖤
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
276d
ChatGPT releasing Task today is my bet — this is the true beginning of ending Gary Marcus take that AI is useless. 🔥

The statement engages in a discussion about the future of AI development, specifically addressing the concept of an 'AI Winter.' The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using sarcasm to challenge the idea that AI progress will halt. The intent is to refute the notion of a permanent AI Winter and criticize the use of hyperbole in the debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a confrontational tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of sarcasm and dismissive language could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of personal attack by mocking the idea of a permanent AI Winter, which could be seen as a violation of constructive dialogue. [-1]