Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 68
12/19/2024, 3:11:32 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
276d
@GaryMarcus it’s not an order of mangitude more compute / data is why

it just gets results on benchmarks as though it had an order of magnitude more.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
@iruletheworldmo mildly. if you read the OpenAI blog, it works best where one can augment data etc, and it is by no means an across the board improvement. which is presumably why they didn’t call it GPT-5.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
276d
@GaryMarcus seriously though. you must be impressed with test time compute.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
@iruletheworldmo are you as foolish as you pretend to be? If the cases are in the training set, that likely seriously undermines the practical value of the result.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
276d
https://x.com/iruletheworldmo/st…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
You have to read very far into the replies in thread to discover that the cases may be in the training set.

Caveat emptor.

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a discussion on AI models, specifically GPT-4o, and their performance in various tasks. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of AI capabilities and the transparency of AI companies, which are public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone of the conversation, especially earlier comments, could be perceived as dismissive or condescending.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but earlier comments in the thread could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing the information presented.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the interpretation of the blog, but the overall tone of the conversation could be more respectful and less personal. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and engages in a public discussion about AI, but the responsibility and integrity of the discourse could be improved by maintaining a more respectful tone.