Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -38

The statement criticizes the Global Engagement Center (GEC) as part of a broader discussion on government censorship and funding. It uses strong language ('creepiest') to express disapproval, aligning with a critical tone towards perceived censorship activities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the GEC, labeling it as 'creepy,' which could be seen as disrespectful.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive and critical tone without offering solutions or engaging in meaningful discussion.聽[-1]