In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
274d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
274d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
274d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
274d
The statement and related content engage in public discourse by addressing concerns about government funding and alleged censorship, particularly focusing on the State Department's Global Engagement Center (GEC) and its impact on conservative media. The tone is critical and suggests a lack of transparency and potential misuse of government resources.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting government-backed censorship, which could harm public trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It raises privacy and dignity concerns by accusing the government of secretive actions without providing full context. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to influence public opinion against perceived government overreach. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.