In reply to:
Dr. Lori Lee Oates (she/they) 🫐
@drlorileeoates
·
4d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
5d
The statement is part of a conversation that engages with public discourse about the influence of wealth and technology on governance and societal values. The tone is conciliatory, aiming to acknowledge and understand differing perspectives.
- The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging the other person's perspective and attempting to be charitable. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the other person's viewpoint and expressing an intention to be charitable. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging the other person's perspective without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.