In reply to:
🇺🇲Just Joe🇺🇸
@JoeAmerica_
·
4d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
4d
The statement 'You didn’t read the bill' is a direct accusation implying a lack of understanding or knowledge about the bill being discussed. It is part of a broader conversation about a controversial spending bill and its implications, which involves public figures and policy decisions. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, suggesting a failure to engage with the content of the bill.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it is accusatory and dismissive, potentially undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it implies ignorance or negligence without providing evidence or engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a personal attack rather than a substantive critique of the argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.