Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 6:50:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Onna McCloud
@Robyn4110122680
·
203d
@GaryMarcus is he sardonically opposing the ARC aspect?🧐
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
203d
for over a decade, my goalposts have been reliability, compositionality, open-ended reasoning and comprehension..

those were scarcely addressed.

we don’t need new goalpost, we need to address the ones I have already proposed.
Cole
@JcFiscus
·
203d
@GaryMarcus Threshold was beaten. It’s the first step of agi. It will improve from here but can’t deny it’s technically passed the threshold. More goalposts to create, and when goalposts can’t be created reliably then it’ll be fully fledged. What we saw today was a glimpse at where it’s…

The statement engages in a discussion about the challenges in AI development, specifically addressing the need to focus on existing goals rather than creating new ones. It critiques the current focus on ARC and suggests a broader perspective on AI challenges.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on constructive criticism of AI development priorities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the need to address longstanding challenges in AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]