Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 9:07:37 PM
X
In reply to:
AGI Awaiter
@agi_awaiter
·
203d
@GaryMarcus I’m in graduate school. What I conclude is that a tiny model performs slightly worse than a bigger model.

You’re lashing out because this predictions list is dead in the water. That was your whole thing and it’s gone. It’s okay maybe AVM can give some consolation?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
203d
The fan boys who are declaring victory now clearly never went to graduate school, where you learn to pick apart a bunch of graphs and ask hard questions.

Like, what does the top left graph here tell us?

The statement engages in a discussion about AI model predictions and performance, referencing a public figure's predictions and a graduate student's observations. The tone is somewhat confrontational, questioning the validity of the predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is confrontational, which could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the confrontational tone could be more respectful.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement challenges another's predictions, which is a form of critique, but it lacks constructive elements and leans towards personal attack. [-1]