The statement is part of a public discourse on the evaluation of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its capabilities, particularly in handling complex tasks like legal research. The conversation involves a critique of current AGI evaluations and their focus on coding rather than open-ended reasoning.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive discussion about AGI capabilities.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by discussing the limitations of current AGI evaluations and suggesting areas for improvement.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the topic of AGI evaluation.
[+1]