Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 9:26:40 PM
X
In reply to:
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
202d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter "This is not merely incremental improvement, but a genuine breakthrough, marking a qualitative shift in AI capabilities compared to the prior limitations of LLMs." — @fchollet on o3
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
@agi_awaiter dead in the water? all 7 were confirmed. which do you doubt?
AGI Awaiter
@agi_awaiter
·
202d
@GaryMarcus I’m in graduate school. What I conclude is that a tiny model performs slightly worse than a bigger model.

You’re lashing out because this predictions list is dead in the water. That was your whole thing and it’s gone. It’s okay maybe AVM can give some consolation?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
202d
The fan boys who are declaring victory now clearly never went to graduate school, where you learn to pick apart a bunch of graphs and ask hard questions.

Like, what does the top left graph here tell us?

The statement is part of a public discourse on AI advancements, specifically discussing predictions and claims about AI model capabilities. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification, indicating a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and seeks clarification rather than making accusations. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking for evidence or clarification. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning a claim without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]