Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the progress towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a significant public issue in the field of technology and artificial intelligence. The tone is assertive and seeks clarification while expressing dissatisfaction with the previous responses. The intent is to obtain a specific answer to a question about AGI progress, while also setting boundaries against perceived disrespect.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration, which could be perceived as confrontational.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but includes a warning about blocking, which could be seen as a defensive measure against perceived harassment.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement seeks constructive dialogue by asking for a specific answer but includes a threat to block, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]