Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 9:39:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Xeno
@shorttimelines
·
200d
@GaryMarcus I didn’t insult you but go ahead
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@shorttimelines how? i am asking for an actual specific answer. to me it looks more like more of the same when the foundational problems i have long emphasized still have not been addressed.

if you insult me again, rather than actually answering my question, i will block you.
Xeno
@shorttimelines
·
200d
@GaryMarcus Yes, obviously it’s not. It’s an expression of disbelief. It’s clear that this is a step towards AGI. If you can’t see that, you’re being wilfully ignorant
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@shorttimelines that’s not an answer, and no i am not kidding.
Xeno
@shorttimelines
·
200d
@GaryMarcus You have got to be kidding
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
Serious question: in what way is o3 a “step towards AGI”?

The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses a public issue related to the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and engages in a debate about the progress towards AGI. The tone is defensive and seeks to clarify the nature of the discourse, pointing out the use of ad hominem arguments by @shorttimelines.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement correctly identifies the use of an ad hominem argument by @shorttimelines and calls for a more constructive dialogue. This aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]