Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 9:42:15 PM
X
In reply to:
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
200d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter @fchollet good clarification. Many would say that the bar for breakthrough / significant advance is lower than for AGI though; hence putting your 2024 prediction against breakthrough on thin ice.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet thanks, and further down (and something I would agree with) “it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it…
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
200d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter @fchollet here: https://arcprize.org/blog/oai-o3…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@foundjuliette @agi_awaiter @fchollet I disagree, but where did he say that? it’s not in his feed.
juliette pluto
@foundjuliette
·
200d
@GaryMarcus @agi_awaiter "This is not merely incremental improvement, but a genuine breakthrough, marking a qualitative shift in AI capabilities compared to the prior limitations of LLMs." — @fchollet on o3
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@agi_awaiter dead in the water? all 7 were confirmed. which do you doubt?

The statement critiques the performance of a new AI model, comparing it to its predecessors and suggesting it does not represent a significant improvement. It engages in a technical discussion about AI advancements, contributing to public discourse on AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it provides a factual analysis based on data. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism, focusing on the performance of the AI model without personal attacks. [+1]