Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 10:50:07 PM
X
In reply to:
AI Architect 🤖🔧
@ShivyanRiaz
·
196d
@GaryMarcus Obvious: Every technology is expensive at first, but it doesn’t take long to become more affordable.

Even GPT-3 was of 175 billion parameters, but now the same performance you can get in 7B model on your local machine.

Things are only going to get better from here 🏄‍♂️.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
196d
@ShivyanRiaz you like everyone else seemed to stop before the paragraphs that followed. sigh.
AI Architect 🤖🔧
@ShivyanRiaz
·
196d
@GaryMarcus I read his comment on OpenAI’s o1 release today: “This is not merely incremental improvement, but a genuine breakthrough.”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
196d
@ShivyanRiaz Did you read Chollet’s comments that I quoted earlier?
AI Architect 🤖🔧
@ShivyanRiaz
·
196d
@GaryMarcus @GaryMarcus please set aside your biases or stop misleading your audience (who are clearly in denial). Take a look at what the creator of the ARC-AGI benchmark has to say about OpenAI O3 👇
Greg Kamradt
@GregKamradt
·
196d
We verified the o3 results for OpenAI on @arcprize

My first thought when I saw the prompt they used to claim their score was...

"That's it?"

It was refreshing (impressive) to see the prompt be so simple

"Find the common rule that maps an input grid to an output grid"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
196d
Serious question: in what way is o3 a “step towards AGI”?

The statement is part of a discussion on the progress and future of AI technology, specifically regarding AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The tone is conversational and slightly humorous, indicating a difference in opinion about the timeline for achieving AGI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is part of a constructive dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about technological progress. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]