Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/20/2024, 10:51:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Pablo Eder
@pablothee
·
196d
@GaryMarcus For many the arc test was the final unbeatable test towards AGI. Do you have a better test for AGI? You could develop it and set a prize or find sponsors.

Otherwise it just feels like the goalpost keeps moving.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
196d
Serious question: in what way is o3 a “step towards AGI”?
Brennan Erbz
@BrennanErbz
·
196d
@GaryMarcus The larger issue that we all have is that you keep promoting the idea that progress has stalled or will stall, and that seems to be incorrect.

Is this AGI? No. Is this a step towards AGI? Yes.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI), engaging in a debate about the progress and testing of AGI. It references a conversation about the validity of certain tests and the expectations around AGI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is part of a technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding by engaging in a dialogue about AGI and referencing an article that may provide insights. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the validity of tests for AGI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public debate about AGI, using the platform responsibly. [+1]