In reply to:
Roy
@Rwill235
ยท
1d
Kaz Kalur
@KasanWright
ยท
1d
Yonathan Arbel
@ProfArbel
ยท
1d
The statement engages in a discussion about AI capabilities, questioning the reliability of AI in understanding and interpreting text beyond the literal meaning. It invites evidence-based dialogue by asking for data and sources to support claims.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual accuracy and evidence.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and constructive dialogue by requesting data to clarify the discussion.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning claims and seeking evidence without personal attacks.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.