Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 133

Reposted by Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus @fchollet Well said. Passing ARC-AGI highlights progress in solving specific challenges, not achieving AGI. True AGI requires reasoning, adaptability, and guaranteed correctness across all tasks, not just isolated benchmarks. The distinction cannot be overstated.

12/21/2024, 2:17:12 AM

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the nature of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the limitations of current benchmarks like ARC-AGI. It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between progress in specific AI challenges and the broader goal of achieving true AGI.

Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the distinction between solving specific AI challenges and achieving AGI, fostering a more informed discussion. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages constructively with the ongoing conversation, adding to the dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly contributing to the discourse on AI, using the platform to clarify misconceptions. [+2]