In reply to:
nick
@MightyNimbus
·
195d
The statement by @GaryMarcus engages in a public discourse about the development and predictions related to AI, specifically addressing the issue of falsifiability in AI predictions. The tone is defensive and aims to assert credibility in the ongoing debate about AI advancements.
- The statement engages in a dialogue with a critic, @MightyNimbus, by addressing the concern about falsifiability. It does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the subject matter. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies a willingness to provide evidence for past predictions, which suggests an openness to acknowledging and correcting mistakes if necessary. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the platform to assert the importance of falsifiability in AI predictions, which is a responsible use of free speech in the context of scientific discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.