In reply to:
Ben Goertzel
@bengoertzel
·
195d
The statement engages in a technical critique of AI model capabilities, questioning the evidence of a model's ability to map English into predicate logic. It suggests skepticism about the model's performance, attributing success to data augmentation rather than inherent capability.
- The statement does not cause harm and focuses on a technical critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the evidence and encouraging critical analysis. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.