Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/21/2024, 12:55:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Chris
@Cory29565470
·
196d
@fchollet @DoktorMoose So @GaryMarcus was right? over @ylecun
François Chollet
@fchollet
·
197d
@DoktorMoose It's doing CoT search (on a massive scale, when on high compute settings -- tens of millions of tokens to process a single short question), so it falls into the neurosymbolic category.
Mustafa Akben
@DoktorMoose
·
197d
@fchollet Do you think this is optimal? o3 represent a neuro-symbolic approach or fully sub-symbolic?
François Chollet
@fchollet
·
197d
Today OpenAI announced o3, its next-gen reasoning model. We've worked with OpenAI to test it on ARC-AGI, and we believe it represents a significant breakthrough in getting AI to adapt to novel tasks.

It scores 75.7% on the semi-private eval in low-compute mode (for $20 per task…

The statement is part of a technical discussion about AI models, specifically regarding the classification of a system as neurosymbolic. It engages with public discourse on AI technology and its categorization, contributing to the broader conversation about AI development and capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about AI categorization. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]