Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/21/2024, 2:48:21 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
200d
@GaryMarcus I assume you know why I don't like the list.

robotics will take longer and creative writing ect will be harder because we don't have right answers/tbinking to train on.

but if we get systems that cure disease ect, simply by scaling current paradigms.

the list just becomes…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@iruletheworldmo such a dumb comment; literally an ad hominem with zero argument. among your least impressive.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
200d
@GaryMarcus such a dumb list 😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
Some AGI-relevant predictions I made publicly long before o3 about what AI could not do by the end of 2025.

Do you seriously think o3-enhanced AI will solve any of them in next 12.5 months?

The conversation involves a debate on the capabilities and future of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and its comparison to human abilities. The tone is somewhat contentious, with ad hominem remarks present. The discussion touches on the feasibility of AGI achieving certain tasks by 2025, as outlined in the image.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial ad hominem comment by @GaryMarcus violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it dismisses the other person's input without constructive engagement. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The ad hominem attack also disrespects the dignity of the other participant, failing to engage in a respectful dialogue. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation lacks constructive criticism and instead includes personal attacks, which hinders productive dialogue. [-2]