Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
12/21/2024, 2:50:42 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
200d
@GaryMarcus just hypothetically let's say it comes up with some cure for cancer.

imagine in that scenario replying, but can it ride a mountain bike.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@iruletheworldmo well ok but what do you mean by dumb? there was just no argument and exposition or anything, just a pejorative. that’s not helpful.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
200d
@GaryMarcus I didn't present an argument but I critiqued the list not you.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
@iruletheworldmo such a dumb comment; literally an ad hominem with zero argument. among your least impressive.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
200d
@GaryMarcus such a dumb list 😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
200d
Some AGI-relevant predictions I made publicly long before o3 about what AI could not do by the end of 2025.

Do you seriously think o3-enhanced AI will solve any of them in next 12.5 months?

The conversation involves a debate about the capabilities of AI, specifically regarding predictions about what AI can achieve by 2025. The tone is somewhat contentious, with elements of sarcasm and critique. The discussion touches on the potential and limitations of AI, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial comment by @GaryMarcus calling a comment 'dumb' violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it is dismissive and pejorative. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation includes elements of sarcasm and personal critique, which could be seen as disrespectful, particularly in the initial exchanges. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue lacks constructive criticism initially, with personal attacks rather than substantive engagement. However, later replies attempt to refocus on the topic of AI capabilities.