The statement highlights differing opinions on the difficulty of FrontierMath questions between a mathematician and an AI researcher. It humorously points out the contrast in perspectives, suggesting a broader discussion on the nature of problem-solving in AI and mathematics.
- The statement does no harm and maintains a lighthearted tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by presenting different expert opinions, encouraging further discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by highlighting differing views without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.