Gary Marcus

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 117
12/21/2024, 7:20:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
214d
@littmath @DrJimFan I wouldn’t conclude that just yet. I await clarification on the pretraining and augmention, as well tests from people like you and @colin_fraser on problems slightly structured differently.

Of course we also don’t know what is inside the system.
Daniel Litt
@littmath
·
214d
@GaryMarcus @DrJimFan Hold on, that's not what I'm saying--they're still very hard questions! Just not so hard for people who really know this stuff. Suggests the AI does in some sense really know this stuff.

The statement is part of a technical discussion about AI systems and their capabilities, specifically addressing the need for trained professionals to evaluate certain aspects. It contributes to public discourse by engaging in a substantive dialogue about AI technology and its evaluation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying that the evaluation should be conducted by trained professionals, which promotes responsible discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a previous oversight by updating the post to specify 'for trained professionals,' demonstrating a willingness to correct mistakes. [+1]