Gary Marcus

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 112
12/21/2024, 7:24:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Bark Ruffalo's second personality
@TheAlphaDoggo
·
215d
@GaryMarcus @littmath @DrJimFan We need new benchmarks that actually make sense for measuring machine reasoning.
Bark Ruffalo's second personality
@TheAlphaDoggo
·
215d
@GaryMarcus @littmath @DrJimFan @GaryMarcus @littmath @DrJimFan The real issue isn't difficulty level - it's that we're using human math education standards to evaluate AI math capabilities. Like comparing a calculator to an abacus master.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
215d
Funny juxtaposition in my feed, mathematician @littmath says the particular FrontierMath questions weren’t that hard [for trained professionals]; AI researcher @DrJimFan says they were “insanely hard”.

Most important question in my mind hasn’t been addressed anywhere: what was…

The statement critiques OpenAI's lack of transparency regarding the data used in their AI models and the absence of public demos. It highlights concerns about the reliability of AI benchmarks and the need for openness in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and raises valid concerns about transparency. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on corporate practices rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's practices without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    Uses influence to advocate for transparency and better practices in AI development. [+1]