The statement expresses skepticism about product demonstrations and OpenAI's practices, suggesting a lack of transparency and potential manipulation in AI training. It questions the validity of OpenAI's claims, especially regarding the training data used for their models.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful if it spreads distrust without sufficient evidence, but it also encourages critical thinking.ย [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions OpenAI's transparency, which could be seen as a challenge to their integrity, but it does not engage in personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue about the ethics and transparency of AI development, which is constructive criticism.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.