In reply to:
Tesla addict
@truth_zeeker
·
369d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
369d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
369d
The statement critiques the transparency and robustness of AI model training and evaluation, suggesting skepticism about the results due to potential biases in question construction and lack of transparency.
- The statement raises concerns about transparency and robustness, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for clarity and accuracy in AI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on technical critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the methodology and results, encouraging dialogue on AI evaluation practices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.