In reply to:
Brett McFadden
@BrettAMcFadden
ยท
369d
The statement criticizes the current focus on large language models (LLMs) for alignment in AI development, suggesting that the collective effort should be redirected towards more effective solutions. The tone is somewhat dismissive, using the term 'shitty' to describe LLMs as a basis for alignment, which may detract from constructive dialogue.
- The use of the term 'shitty' could be seen as harmful or dismissive, which may not align with striving to do no harm with words.ย [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses a current approach without offering constructive alternatives.ย [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and could be seen as a personal attack on those who support LLMs for alignment, rather than engaging in a respectful dialogue.ย [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to redirect focus towards better solutions, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.