In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
ยท
369d
Brett McFadden
@BrettAMcFadden
ยท
369d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI alignment and safety, engaging with public figures in the AI community. The conversation involves a critique of large language models (LLMs) and their role in AI alignment, emphasizing the need for better solutions and resource allocation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a critical discussion on AI safety.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a dialogue about AI alignment and the need for better solutions.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the topic of AI alignment.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for better resource allocation towards AI safety, contributing to societal betterment.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public debate on AI alignment responsibly.ย [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.