In reply to:
Rob S.
@RobS142
·
370d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about the limitations of vision language models, referencing a specific paper to support the argument. It critiques the performance of AI models and questions the validity of certain training practices, contributing to a broader debate on AI development and evaluation.
- The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a technical discussion, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing evidence to support its argument, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.