In reply to:
馃崜馃崜馃崜
@iruletheworldmo
路
370d
The statement is part of a conversation involving public figures and platforms, touching on issues of control and influence over social media feeds, which can be considered a public discourse topic.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration about being attacked, which is neutral in terms of harm prevention.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention being attacked, indicating a potential issue with respect to privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead focuses on personal grievances, which could be seen as a missed opportunity for constructive engagement.聽[-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.