Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/21/2024, 9:13:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Cooper
@peakcooper
·
370d
@GaryMarcus @fchollet Why does artificial intelligence need to be comparable to people?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
@peakcooper @fchollet if they are all training on 100% (I haven’t followed the benchmark), none of them are really comparable to people.
Cooper
@peakcooper
·
370d
@GaryMarcus @fchollet Gary, the previous solutions all trained on 100% of the training set, yet got results like 5%
What gives?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
Update: It IS true, from @fchollet’s blog. 𝗢𝟯 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝟳𝟱% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗥𝗖-𝗔𝗚𝗜.

Yesterday’s announcement shows what you can do when teach to the test and spend enormous amounts of money.

How much the demo says about real…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
Wow. This, if true, raises serious questions about yesterday’s announcement.

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of artificial intelligence, specifically its ability to generalize compared to humans. It questions the evidence supporting AI's generalization abilities, contributing to a broader debate on AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning the evidence of AI's capabilities, encouraging further exploration and discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without personal attacks. [+1]