Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/21/2024, 9:15:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg Speicher
@Greg_Speicher
·
370d
@GaryMarcus @GaryMarcus Apologies if you’ve already addressed this, but what’s your take on Google’s slew of recent releases? (Not AGI—far from it—but perhaps interesting efforts to explore product-market fit with current frontier models.)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
Never trust a staged demo.
Never trust a product you haven’t tried.
Never trust OpenAI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
Update: It IS true, from @fchollet’s blog. 𝗢𝟯 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝟳𝟱% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗥𝗖-𝗔𝗚𝗜.

Yesterday’s announcement shows what you can do when teach to the test and spend enormous amounts of money.

How much the demo says about real…

The statement is part of a broader discussion about AI developments and product releases, specifically addressing concerns about transparency and testing in AI models. The tone is skeptical and critical, focusing on the need for firsthand experience with products before forming opinions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is cautious and does not directly harm others, but it does express frustration about access limitations.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the reliability of demos and the importance of personal testing. [+1]