In reply to:
Impolitic
@impoliticaljnky
·
370d
Andriy Burkov
@burkov
·
370d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about AI capabilities, specifically addressing the concept of zero-shot learning and the implications of training on large datasets. It critiques the claims of having achieved AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) by suggesting that true AGI would not require tuning on specific datasets if it had already processed a significant portion of the internet. This contributes to public discourse by questioning the validity of AI demonstrations and claims.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the integrity of AI claims, which can be seen as promoting accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the claims of AGI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the claims of AGI, the statement encourages transparency and integrity in AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.