Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement compares a hypothetical scenario involving Taylor Swift with a critique of OpenAI's transparency regarding their training data. It touches on public discourse by addressing issues of transparency and honesty in public figures and organizations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies potential harm through lack of transparency.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and organizations without engaging in harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and accountability by highlighting the importance of transparency. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for transparency, which can be seen as a societal benefit. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses its platform to discuss public concerns responsibly. [+1]