Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/21/2024, 9:54:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Gabs
@pizoeiro
·
371d
@GaryMarcus In any other sector, calling the creator of a tool that validates your own work (and brings you money through hype) to launch your product and still referring to them as a "partner" would be extremely unethical and suspicious. Why is this not obvious in this case?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
371d
If Taylor Swift lipsynced her way through her Eras Tours, it would be a huge scandal. (And she would never do such a thing.)

If OpenAI gave a big spiel about solving ARC-AGI and didn’t say out loud that they trained on 75% of the public examples, and didn’t dwell on the fact…

The statement is part of a conversation discussing ethical concerns related to the launch of a product and the involvement of a creator whose work validates the product. It touches on issues of transparency and ethics in business practices, which are public concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of a decision, which is a neutral stance.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for privacy and dignity.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the wisdom of appearing in a video, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]