In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
371d
The statement engages in a discussion about the implications of training models on a subset of data, questioning the transparency and effectiveness of such practices. It raises concerns about the validity of recent announcements related to AI training methods.
- The statement raises questions about AI training practices, which could lead to a better understanding of ethical AI development, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on technical aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the transparency of AI training methods, promoting dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.