Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/21/2024, 10:10:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Per-Anders Edwards
@per_anders
·
371d
@GaryMarcus I find it sick that OpenAI feel Christmas is the best time to post something so carefully pitched to cause such stress and distress for attention. Real scrooge move. It's tough to hear the very upset in dm's & mail, I can explain why it's marketing rot, but it's still damaging.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
371d
Never trust a staged demo.
Never trust a product you haven’t tried.
Never trust OpenAI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
371d
Update: It IS true, from @fchollet’s blog. 𝗢𝟯 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝟳𝟱% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗥𝗖-𝗔𝗚𝗜.

Yesterday’s announcement shows what you can do when teach to the test and spend enormous amounts of money.

How much the demo says about real…

The statement critiques OpenAI's timing and marketing strategy, suggesting it causes unnecessary stress. It uses a metaphor to emphasize the perceived insensitivity of the action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by OpenAI's actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as harsh in tone, potentially bordering on disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing more on expressing disapproval. [-1]