In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
路
372d
Hazard Cookie
@hazardcookie
路
372d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about the practices of OpenAI, specifically regarding their training sets and transparency. It involves a critique of OpenAI's methods and the integrity of their public statements, which are public issues related to AI ethics and corporate transparency.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the broader conversation critiques potential harm from lack of transparency.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is part of a critical dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a critical dialogue but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement contributes to public discourse on AI ethics and transparency, upholding free speech principles.聽[+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.