Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/21/2024, 10:26:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Clay
@ClayCampaigne
·
396d
Goalpost-moving Gary.
Two days ago the arc benchmark was the arc benchmark (all Chollet had said was that generating millions or billions of examples would be gaming the benchmark). Now the benchmark includes the new stipulation that the *public training set* be excluded.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
396d
@WallpaperKeith @fchollet i don’t think humans would need 75% of the training set in this instance or many others.

and it raises the question of whether they were learning the abstract idea, or just idiosyncrasies of how these problems were constructed.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the validity and implications of using the ARC benchmark for AGI evaluation. The speaker clarifies their position, denying endorsement of ARC as a measure of AGI and addressing a potential misattribution of their views.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify a misunderstanding, which aligns with striving to do no harm by preventing misinformation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The speaker respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or disrespectful language. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misattribution without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]