Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 2:52:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Zggy
@ZggyPlaydGuitar
·
376d
@GaryMarcus @hal_incandenza4 @fchollet it's in the first sentence
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
376d
@hal_incandenza4 As I said before, it’s not about how the test was conducted, it’s about what people took from the video and Sam’s “we didn’t target” remark.

In my informal poll , over half of listeners assumed that o3 had done what @fchollet called the “more impressive” thing of taking the…
David Balfour
@hal_incandenza4
·
376d
@GaryMarcus Chollet himself confirming this is all aboveboard
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
376d
@hal_incandenza4
David Balfour
@hal_incandenza4
·
376d
@GaryMarcus It would be worth calling out the zero-shot performance of the model if that’s what they did. There’s no obligation to detail all the rules of what the challenge allows if they’re just talking about it as is. Anyone else can then learn more about what arc-agi is
David Balfour
@hal_incandenza4
·
376d
@GaryMarcus I did. The performance improvement is relative to other models - which are all trained on the public dataset. Training on the training set available for precisely that purpose is part of the challenge and if you’re not aware of the challenge parameters that’s on you

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of AI testing and communication transparency. It critiques the clarity of a video and a statement made by 'Sam,' suggesting that clearer communication could have prevented misunderstandings about AI capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify misunderstandings, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the content of the communication rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by addressing the need for clearer communication. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the lack of clarity without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]