Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
12/22/2024, 2:53:23 AM
X
In reply to:
Zggy
@ZggyPlaydGuitar
·
376d
@GaryMarcus read
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
376d
more context here about what i (and some others) think the issue is: transparency.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
376d
The replies in this thread shows that there are lots of people *within the ML community* raising the same concerns re how OpenAI discussed ARC that I was making. (And more concerns, e.g, in important comments about how the graph was labeled).

Importantly, this an issue about…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
376d
Incredible video if you watch it a couple times and realize what they actually did, training on 75% of the public set.

Never trust Sam. Ever.
mfarles
@mfarles
·
376d
@GaryMarcus Working on new benchmark together too. What could possibly go wrong?

The statement is part of a broader discussion about transparency and ethical practices in AI development, specifically regarding OpenAI's training methods and communication. The conversation involves concerns about transparency and the accuracy of public statements made by OpenAI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement indirectly addresses potential harm by questioning the transparency of AI practices, which is crucial for ethical AI development. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but challenges the integrity of public statements, which is important for accountability. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding by highlighting the need for transparency in AI practices. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the practices of a major AI organization without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]