The statement 'Jaw drop' is a reaction to a complex discussion about transparency and accuracy in machine learning research, specifically regarding the presentation of data in charts. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of tuning models and the representation of breakthroughs in AI research. This is a substantive engagement with public issues related to scientific integrity and transparency in AI, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it is part of a conversation that critiques potentially misleading information, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for accurate representation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement 'Jaw drop' is neutral in promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion, but the broader conversation it is part of seeks to clarify and correct potentially misleading information, which indirectly supports this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a reaction to a discussion that involves constructive criticism of data presentation practices in AI research. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is part of a public discourse that upholds free speech and uses the platform to question and discuss important issues in AI research, thus aligning with responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.